The CIPD have recently issued a research report on zero-hours and short-hours contracts. It makes interesting reading. It should certainly be studied by all those people criticising these flexible working arrangements and calling for more legislation or even an outright ban.
The government's Labour Force Survey shows that the number of people on zero-hours contracts has almost tripled in less than three years. Although some of this may just be greater public awareness of these arrangements it does look like they are growing in popularity. And that is not just popularity with employers. Employees like them as well.
People who want to fit work around the rest of their lives appreciate the flexibility of these arrangements. Not surprisingly, they are more positive than other employees about their work-life balance. But they are also slightly more satisfied with their jobs and feel less pressured than employees on the whole. So, far from being exploited, they are happy with the arrangements.
The most common reason for using zero-hours contracts is 'to manage fluctuations in demand' (mentioned by 66% of employers). But this is closely followed by 'provide flexibility for the individual' (51%). This shows that these contracts are a way of delivering flexibility for the individual not just the organisation. And it's not all about saving money. Reducing costs is a specific objective for just 21% of employers.
The CIPD concludes: "An outright ban on zero-hours contracts could do more harm than good... Employers with little concern for their employees’ well-being could simply change contracts to
guarantee a very small minimum number of hours or replace zero- hours contracts with casual labour.
The best way to improve the working lives of the zero-hours contract workforce is to help employers understand why they need to develop flexible and fair working practices and how to implement them."
It seems that we have found a working relationship that works well for employers AND employees. It may be open to abuse, but let's not deny the majority the benefit of a flexible working relationship they enjoy, in order to curb the few cases of exploitation.
This blog is my way of sharing my thoughts on the way work is changing. I hope this will generate some thought and discussion about the evolving world of work and the influence on organisations, management and individuals.
Sunday, December 27, 2015
Wednesday, September 02, 2015
Webinars versus Seminars
It struck me as slightly ironic that I'm involved in organising a workshop, based in London, on the subject of agile and remote working. If we are now in the age of webinars instead of seminars and YouTube recordings instead of live presentations, why are we running a physical event. Why not a virtual one?
That made me think. Why do we go to football matches when you can get a better view on TV? Why do people go to the cinema when they can watch the film in the comfort of their home? Why go to the pub if you can get a beer out of the fridge?
It's all about socialising. We like sharing experiences with other people, chatting and enjoying their company. We can do some of this by social media but there is no substitute for face to face communications. Going out for a meal with someone else is a very different experience to sitting in a restaurant on your own, even though you get to enjoy the same food.
So a seminar/workshop/conference has to be a worthwhile experience for the participant, not just sitting and listening to speakers. I can do that by looking at TED talks on YouTube without leaving my desk or TV. I want to be able to interact with the other people in the room, sharing ideas and learning from each other. I often reckon the best parts of some events are the coffee and lunch breaks where you happen to meet someone interesting. But this shouldn't be down to accident, there should be interaction designed in.
When we thought about the kind of event we wanted to run in November we realised it had to be one that was a learning experience. We resisted the temptation to come up with a list of impressive sounding speakers and decided to run the day between three of us. We've kept the number of people to a maximum of 24 so we could give everyone a chance to contribute. And to give real individual attention we added a telephone follow-up session to help with action plans.
To find out more about this workshop go to http://bit.ly/WW241115. It's going to be unique!
Peter
That made me think. Why do we go to football matches when you can get a better view on TV? Why do people go to the cinema when they can watch the film in the comfort of their home? Why go to the pub if you can get a beer out of the fridge?
It's all about socialising. We like sharing experiences with other people, chatting and enjoying their company. We can do some of this by social media but there is no substitute for face to face communications. Going out for a meal with someone else is a very different experience to sitting in a restaurant on your own, even though you get to enjoy the same food.
So a seminar/workshop/conference has to be a worthwhile experience for the participant, not just sitting and listening to speakers. I can do that by looking at TED talks on YouTube without leaving my desk or TV. I want to be able to interact with the other people in the room, sharing ideas and learning from each other. I often reckon the best parts of some events are the coffee and lunch breaks where you happen to meet someone interesting. But this shouldn't be down to accident, there should be interaction designed in.
When we thought about the kind of event we wanted to run in November we realised it had to be one that was a learning experience. We resisted the temptation to come up with a list of impressive sounding speakers and decided to run the day between three of us. We've kept the number of people to a maximum of 24 so we could give everyone a chance to contribute. And to give real individual attention we added a telephone follow-up session to help with action plans.
To find out more about this workshop go to http://bit.ly/WW241115. It's going to be unique!
Peter
Saturday, August 08, 2015
Building a productive workforce
Productivity has been in the headlines recently. The government is trying to improve the performance of the country in the league tables and various bodies have come out with reports on how this can be achieved. One of them is ACAS.
Its 50 page report “Building Productivity in the UK” focuses on the workplace as the place where “the elements of productivity come together to deliver goods and services.’ They say “How businesses manage and organise their workforce has a huge influence on delivering the improvements that the country needs.” -very true!
This will be a key theme at the Wisework/Workpond workshop being run in November , “Building a high performance productive workforce”. (More information here).
Here are some more points from the ACAS report:
In 2013, UK productivity was an estimated 17% lower than the G7 average
And…
Ineffective management is estimated to cost UK businesses over £19billion per year on lost working hours
But…
Employees reporting higher levels of control over their work had high levels of job related contentment, enthusiasm and satisfaction
And…
Best practice management development can result in a 23% increase in organisational performance
So it seems that giving people more autonomy over their working practices is likely to improve their productivity. This comes out in numerous case studies and on research into engagement. Since this is what management gurus have been saying for the last 50 years it should come as no surprise.
Making this happen is the challenge. Getting managers to change their habits from ‘command and control’ to ‘trust and empower’ isn’t always easy. The workshop in November will tackle this by helping the participants build an action plan for their own organisation and they will get follow-on support after the event.
Let’s hope this adds a small contribution to the productivity drive for the UK as a whole.
Its 50 page report “Building Productivity in the UK” focuses on the workplace as the place where “the elements of productivity come together to deliver goods and services.’ They say “How businesses manage and organise their workforce has a huge influence on delivering the improvements that the country needs.” -very true!
This will be a key theme at the Wisework/Workpond workshop being run in November , “Building a high performance productive workforce”. (More information here).
Here are some more points from the ACAS report:
In 2013, UK productivity was an estimated 17% lower than the G7 average
And…
Ineffective management is estimated to cost UK businesses over £19billion per year on lost working hours
But…
Employees reporting higher levels of control over their work had high levels of job related contentment, enthusiasm and satisfaction
And…
Best practice management development can result in a 23% increase in organisational performance
So it seems that giving people more autonomy over their working practices is likely to improve their productivity. This comes out in numerous case studies and on research into engagement. Since this is what management gurus have been saying for the last 50 years it should come as no surprise.
Making this happen is the challenge. Getting managers to change their habits from ‘command and control’ to ‘trust and empower’ isn’t always easy. The workshop in November will tackle this by helping the participants build an action plan for their own organisation and they will get follow-on support after the event.
Let’s hope this adds a small contribution to the productivity drive for the UK as a whole.
Thursday, May 07, 2015
Reinventing Work for the Digital Age
I recently had the pleasure of speaking in Boston at the USA
launch of a new book “Reinventing the Company in the Digital Age”. The book was
put together by the Spanish bank, BBVA as part of their Open Mind project (see https://www.bbvaopenmind.com/en/)
This was a great opportunity to reflect on how organisations
are changing “in the Digital Age”. It’s easy to think of this as just being the
impact of technology on the way we carry out our tasks. In fact the Digital Age
is as much a social change as it is a technological revolution in the way we
work.
Take the example of social media. This has revolutionised
the way some people communicate with their friends and colleagues. They share
views, express opinions, join in discussions, send congratulations and celebrate
life’s achievements without the physical constraints of the “Analogue Age”.
They are using the internet to cut through the barriers of time and distance to
share experiences with others and make real friends.
So it’s hardly surprising to find that the “Facebook
Generation” are much more comfortable than their predecessors in expressing
their views through blogs, discussion forums and video clips. They can see the
benefits in these being available to a wide audience instantly and being a
lasting resource. Compare this with the traditional business meeting with its
constraints of time and place. The digital alternative wins out much of the
time.
Yet many organisations see social media as a waste of time
and insist on cramming everyone’s diaries with inefficient face-to-face
meetings. Sometimes, maybe, there is a need to get people together in the same
room, but for many business decisions and sharing of opinions there is a better
digital alternative.
We are also now living in the age of ‘Skype’ video
conversations. I’m amazed at the number
of people who use Skype in their personal lives but never use videoconferencing
at work. Whilst Skype is free and easy to use, the view on video meetings in
the office is still that it’s complicated and expensive. So, again, we have a
generation of people living in the digital age at home and turning the clock
back when they go in to the office.
So “reinventing the company” has to include radical changes
to the way work is performed in the digital age. Not just to use the technology more
effectively, but also to keep up with the expectations of the new generation of
digital natives. For business to succeed it needs to engage with this
workforce, and it won’t do it using out-dated ways of working.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)